نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث اصفهان، دانشگاه پیام نور کاشان، آران و بیدگل، ایران
2 استادیار گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث البرز، دانشگاه پیام نور کرج، ایران
3 الهیات علوم قرآن و حدیث،علوم انسانی، پیام نور، آران و بیدگل، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The structural interpretation of the Qur'an, the method and method of understanding the heavenly text, is one of the new and attractive fields in the field of contemporary academic studies and has had a significant frequency in the last few decades, and many commentators and researchers have stepped into this field. This method seeks to discover the purpose of the divine text and considers it to be dependent on a deep understanding of the purpose and subject of the surah. Part of the scientific investigation of a method is done by comparing and matching it with other scientific methods. In this sense, this research and the innovative research method based on criteria and the question of the new "inferential" institution, with comparison and matching of methods, is a complement to the comparative study of the interpretation method of the commentators, and in the way of doing the work, it is based on the narrowness of opinions, foundations, criteria. , the sources of comprehensive and structural interpretations of the works of two more or less similar and common viewpoints, Al-Mizan Allameh Tabatabaei and Tafsir Al-Bana'i, Dr. Mahmoud Bostani, conducted a comparative examination of their opinions in the field of structural interpretation, and as a result, the necessity of discovering their functional commonalities and differences and their theoretical and practical rules in Relationships, arrangements, purposes of the verses and topics governing the chapters of Surah Ghafar as an example of Surahs Hawamim, the achievements of Mustafa Valgoi in the direction of producing new concepts and leading to the development of correct understanding.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)