Examining the interpretive differences of the two parties regarding the legislative verses of the field of marriage

Document Type : Original

Authors

1 ostad

2 PhD graguate in jurisprudence and fundamentals of law at the International University of Islamic Religions and a level 4 student in the field of comparative interpretation at Qasim bin Al-Hassan Seminary Institute of Higher Education

3 gasambnhasan

Abstract

Considering the existence of commonalities and interpretive differences in the field of verses of the rules of marriage in the view of the sects, the present article is based on the question about the examples of interpretive differences in the mentioned field with a comparative approach; This research is based on a descriptive method and information has been collected based on the library method. In addition to paying attention to the dignity of revelation, content, context of verses, etc., the use of sources of ijtihad accepted by each religion is also effective in the emergence of theoretical differences. According to research, in the discussion of legitimacy, the sects differ in the permission of temporary marriage, so that the Imams believe in the permission and the Supreme Sunni believe in its impermissibility. In the prohibitions of marriage, the views related to creating a womb through illegitimate intercourse and marrying women of the Book are different, and in the accessories and functions of marriage, the issues of dowry and its amount, payment of property and alimony, as well as the subject of looking, Vati rulings are differences.

Keywords

Comparative Studies of Quran
Volume 8, Issue 2 - Serial Number 16
January 2024
Pages 88-111

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 October 2021
  • Revise Date: 20 February 2024
  • Accept Date: 27 November 2021
  • Publish Date: 22 December 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics