عنوان مقاله [English]
Quran commentators yet have been presented intellectual and cultural works. Some of them were based on the Qur'an and always try to maintain textual elements of the Quran language. This style of interpretation, though is closer the text of the Quran, but often difficult for readers to understand the text. In contrast, those others are based on the reader, and it bases on deliver the message to their readers. Such an interpretation is easier for readers to understand; because it did not leave any alien and unfamiliar element. One of the things that the second group Commentators was clincher it to understand the verses, is literary evidences commentators hold that the verses were the second group to understand literary testimonies. Kashaf Zmkhshry interpretation, is one of the interpretations that for understand the meaning, used literary evidence in that time. He used literary evidences in his interpretation to understand the meaning and wisdom of the words that used in the verses. On the other hand some interpretations like Lahiji interpretation don’t used the literary evidences, so this interpretations to teach the means are weak, therefore, this article by descriptive and analytical approach, analysis a number of verses in the two mentioned interpretations; by this analysis in these two interpretations, shown the effect of the literary testimonies. and finally concluded that Zamakhshary by the interpretation of the Qurans words based on pre-Islamic poetry, provides simultaneously Common and properties understanding. While Lahiji can’t be successful in the interpretations of intricacies of verbal and explicit meanings transfer and Quranic concepts.