نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکترای رشته تفسیر تطبیقی، جامعة الزهرا (س)، قم، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشگاه علوم و معارف قرآن کریم، قم، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The role and function of reason in understanding and interpreting the Holy Quran is disputed by commentators. Some deny the functions of the intellect in interpreting and understanding the verses of the Qur'an, and some accept it. Ayatollah Javadi Amoli and Rashid Reza are among the commentators who have used reason in understanding the verses. Among the challenging verses that these two commentators have used reason to interpret are the verses of intercession; But given the different principles and presuppositions of truth and the nature of intercession, the result they have obtained is quite contradictory. One has denied intercession by using reason and the other has proved it; Therefore, in the present study, with a descriptive and analytical method and a library study, a comparative comparison of the views of Ayatollah Javadi Amoli in the interpretation of Tasnim and Rashid Reza in the interpretation of Al-Manar about the role and functions of reason in interpreting verses of intercession in the Holy Quran.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)